Last Updated: September 2026
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice. Crypto trading involves significant risk of loss. Never trade with money you cannot afford to lose. Always do your own research (DYOR).
Most Cryptohopper reviews are feature tours. They list the bot types, screenshot the dashboard, hand out a score out of ten, and move on. That is not useless, but it quietly dodges the only question that actually matters when the product is a recurring subscription: does the monthly bill make sense against the money you are trading?
That is the question this review is built around. I am not going to tell you Cryptohopper made me X percent last quarter, because that number would tell you nothing about what it will do for you — different account size, different pairs, different strategy, different market. What I can do is walk you through what the platform actually is, what each tier really unlocks, where it is genuinely weaker than the marketing suggests, and, most importantly, the arithmetic that decides whether a fixed monthly fee is a rational thing for you to take on at all.
If you want the shape of the answer up front: Cryptohopper is a legitimate, mature, well-built cloud trading bot platform, and it is also a product that a lot of people buy at the wrong account size and cancel three months later feeling burned. Both of those things are true at once. Which one applies to you comes down to numbers you can work out in about ninety seconds, and I will show you how.
If you already know you want to look at it, the free tier is the right starting point: Try Cryptohopper free ->.
What Cryptohopper Actually Is (And What It Isn't)
Cryptohopper is a cloud-hosted automation layer that sits between you and an exchange you already use. You create API keys on your exchange, paste them into Cryptohopper, define the rules you want followed, and their servers execute those rules against your exchange account around the clock. The company is based in the Netherlands and has been operating since 2017, which in crypto tooling terms makes it an old institution.
The critical structural point, and the one most new users misunderstand, is that Cryptohopper never holds your coins. Your funds stay on your exchange. Cryptohopper holds a key that can place trades on your behalf, nothing more, assuming you set the key up correctly — which I will come back to. It is not a broker, it is not a fund, and it is not a custodian. It is a rules engine with a good interface.
There are essentially three ways people use it, and they are very different products wearing the same login.
One: you build your own strategy. The visual strategy designer lets you drop technical indicators onto a canvas, set your buy and sell conditions, and combine them with logic rather than writing code. This is the "I have an idea and want it executed consistently" use case.
Two: you rent someone else's strategy. The marketplace sells strategies, templates and signal feeds from third-party creators. Your bot follows their calls. This is the "I do not have an idea and would like to borrow one" use case, and it is where most of the platform's beginners land.
Three: you copy another trader. Social and copy trading lets you mirror a hopper someone else is running, which sits closer to copy trading than to bot trading in spirit.
Layered on top are the specific bot types: standard indicator-driven strategies, dollar-cost-averaging logic, grid bots, a market-making bot, and exchange arbitrage on the higher tiers.
And here is what it is not, stated plainly: Cryptohopper is not an edge. It is an execution layer. It will follow bad rules with the same tireless discipline it follows good ones, which means a losing strategy automated is a losing strategy that loses faster, more consistently, and while you sleep. Automation removes emotional error. It does not manufacture profitability. Anyone selling you the second thing is selling you something else.
Free: Crypto Trading Platform Cheat Sheet
Side-by-side fee comparison, ratings, and quick-pick recommendations for every major exchange and trading bot. Save hours of research.
No spam. Instant download on the next page.
The Subscription Math Nobody Runs Before Signing Up
This is the section I wish someone had put in front of me the first time I looked at a bot subscription, so I am putting it near the top rather than burying it at the end.
A trading bot subscription is a fixed cost against a variable return. That asymmetry is the whole story. Your fee does not shrink in a flat month. It does not shrink in a drawdown. It is the same number every month regardless of what the market does, which means that before you earn a single dollar, your strategy has to clear a hurdle rate set entirely by your account size.
The formula is embarrassingly simple:
Required monthly return to break even = monthly fee / account equity
Run it and the picture gets clear very fast. Take the Explorer tier at roughly $24 a month:
- On a $1,000 account, that is about 2.4% per month just to get back to zero. Compounded, that is roughly a 33% annual return required before the subscription has paid for itself.
- On a $10,000 account, it is about 0.24% per month — under 3% a year. Trivial.
- On a $50,000 account it disappears into rounding error.
Now take the Adventurer tier at roughly $57.50 a month:
- On $5,000, that is about 1.15% per month, close to a 15% annual hurdle.
- On $20,000, about 0.29% per month.
And Hero at roughly $107.50 a month needs a $20,000+ account before it drops under about 0.54% monthly.
Three things make this worse than it first looks, and an honest review should say all three. First, exchange trading fees stack on top. A bot that opens and closes many small positions pays the taker fee and the spread every single time, and on a high-frequency configuration that cost can dwarf the subscription itself. Second, paid marketplace strategies stack on top of that. A $30/month signal feed on a $24/month tier does not cost you $24, it costs you $54, and your break-even hurdle more than doubles. Third, the headline prices are annual billing. Paying month to month costs noticeably more, so the advertised number usually assumes committing for a year to a product you have not validated yet.
I am not saying small accounts should never subscribe. I am saying that if you are running $500, you should be honest that you are paying for education, not for returns. You are buying a structured environment to learn automation in, and that can be a completely reasonable purchase. Just do not confuse it with an investment decision, because at that size the arithmetic says it is not one. Above roughly $10,000, the fee stops being the dominant variable and the quality of your strategy takes over. That is the threshold where this product starts making financial sense rather than educational sense.
Cryptohopper's 2026 Pricing Tiers, Decoded
Cryptohopper runs four tiers. The prices below are the annual-billing rates at the time of writing. Check the pricing page before you commit, because bot platforms adjust tiers regularly and this is exactly the kind of detail that goes stale.
Pioneer (free). Paper trading, one hopper, a tight cap on open positions, and access to the interface. People dismiss the free tier and I think that is a mistake. It is a genuinely functional sandbox: you can connect an exchange, build a strategy in the designer, and run it against live market data with fake money without spending anything. If you skip this step you are paying to learn things you could have learned for free.
Explorer (~$24.16/mo billed annually). The real entry point. More open positions, marketplace access, all supported exchanges, and a strategy evaluation interval measured in the tens of minutes.
Adventurer (~$57.50/mo billed annually). More positions again, a faster evaluation interval, plus the market-making bot and exchange arbitrage. This is the tier for someone running a spread of pairs rather than a single idea.
Hero (~$107.50/mo billed annually). The highest position caps, the fastest evaluation interval, every bot type, priority support. Aimed at people running meaningful capital full time.
Two variables do most of the work in that ladder, and neither is well explained on the pricing page.
The first is maximum open positions. This is not a vanity metric, it is a hard ceiling on diversification. If your strategy wants exposure across thirty pairs and your tier caps you at twenty, your strategy is not being run — a truncated version of it is, and its risk profile is not the one you designed.
The second is the strategy evaluation interval, which is how often the platform re-checks your conditions against the market. This is the specification people misread most often. A 15-minute interval does not mean "trades on the 15-minute chart." It means your bot may not notice a condition for up to fifteen minutes after it becomes true. For a slow mean-reversion or DCA approach, that latency is close to irrelevant. For anything reacting to a breakout, it is the difference between the trade you designed and a materially worse fill. Your strategy's time sensitivity, not your ambition, should pick your tier.
My honest advice on billing: take the free tier for a few weeks, then pay monthly for your first paid period even though it costs more per month. The premium you pay for that flexibility is cheap compared with being locked into a year of a product you discover you do not use.
The Cloud Model: The Real Reason People Pay
Strip away the marketplace and the visual builder, and the thing you are fundamentally buying is this: your bot runs on their servers, not your machine.
That sounds mundane until you have tried the alternative. Crypto does not close. If your automation runs on your laptop, then a closed lid, a Windows update at 3am, a dropped home internet connection or a power flicker is a stopped bot — potentially with an open position and an unfired take-profit sitting on the exchange. Self-hosted frameworks are excellent and free, but "free" means you are now personally responsible for a VPS, deployment, dependency updates, monitoring, alerting, and every bug you introduce. If you have never woken up to find your own bot silently dead for nine hours because a dependency changed underneath it, you have not yet paid the real price of free.
That is what the subscription actually buys: someone else's devops. Uptime, hosting, exchange API maintenance, and a mobile app that lets you kill a bot from a phone. Framed that way, $24 a month is not expensive for infrastructure. It is expensive for infrastructure you are not using.
Now the honest half, because this cuts both ways. Their uptime becomes your uptime. Cryptohopper has had outages and degraded periods, as every cloud trading platform has. When a bot platform stalls, the failure mode is not dramatic — nothing gets stolen — but it is real: a sell condition that triggers and does not execute, entries missed during a move, positions held longer than your rules intended. You have outsourced the machine, and with it a slice of control.
There are sensible mitigations, and I would apply all of them regardless of platform:
- Put your hard risk limits on the exchange, not only in the bot. A stop order resting at your exchange survives your bot platform going dark. A stop that exists only as a rule inside the bot does not.
- Size positions so that a stalled bot is survivable. If a six-hour outage would be catastrophic for your book, the position sizing is the problem, not the outage.
- Do not run latency-sensitive strategies here. Anything whose profitability depends on reacting within seconds is a poor fit for a shared cloud platform running on a multi-minute evaluation interval. That is not a criticism of Cryptohopper specifically, it is a category limit.
- Set exchange-side price alerts so you learn from a second, independent source when something has not happened.
None of this is a reason to avoid the platform. It is a reason to build strategies whose risk does not quietly assume perfect uptime.
The Strategy Marketplace: How to Read It Without Getting Burned
The marketplace is Cryptohopper's most distinctive feature and, simultaneously, the single most common way people lose money on it. Both statements deserve equal weight.
What it is: a storefront where third-party creators list trading strategies, configuration templates and signal feeds. Some are free, many are paid subscriptions on top of your tier. You browse, you subscribe, your bot follows the calls. For someone who wants automation without first spending six months learning technical analysis, the appeal is obvious and legitimate.
Here is the part the storefront does not tell you: a marketplace listing is a marketing page, not a prospectus. No regulator audits it. Nobody independently verifies the numbers on it. The creator's incentive is to accumulate subscribers, and subscriber revenue is stable whether or not your account grows. That is not an accusation of fraud — plenty of creators are serious people running serious systems — it is a statement about whose interests the page is designed to serve.
So vet listings like an adversary. This is the checklist I would use.
How long is the track record, and what did it live through? A strategy with nine months of history that began during a strong uptrend has not really been tested. You want to see it survive a genuine drawdown, a chop regime and a leg down. Anything shorter than a full market cycle is a hypothesis, not evidence.
Is that record live or backtested? These are not remotely the same thing, and listings are not always explicit about which they are showing. Backtested curves can be tuned until they look beautiful. Live curves cannot.
What is the survivorship situation? You are seeing the strategies that stayed listed. The ones that blew up and got delisted are not on the page you are browsing. The average visible performance is therefore biased upward by construction, and you should discount everything you see accordingly.
What is the drawdown, not the return? Anyone can show a return figure. The number that determines whether you will still be subscribed in four months is the worst peak-to-trough decline, because that is the moment you decide whether to hold or panic.
How many trades does it take, and does the fee load kill it? A strategy with a small average edge per trade and high turnover can look net positive on paper and turn net negative once your exchange's taker fee and the spread are applied to every round trip.
Then run it back through the break-even math. A $30/month strategy on a $24/month tier is a $54 monthly obligation. On a $2,000 account that is a 2.7% monthly hurdle before anyone earns anything.
And then the non-negotiable: paper trade it for several weeks before it touches real money. Not two days. Weeks. Paper trading is free on every tier and it is the only honest way to find out whether a listing's claims survive contact with current market conditions. If a strategy cannot tolerate being observed for a month before you fund it, that itself is information.
Backtesting and Paper Trading: Where Cryptohopper Is Genuinely Weak
Time for the least flattering section, because this is where I think the platform is weakest relative to its reputation.
Cryptohopper's backtester is convenient. It plugs directly into the strategy designer, so you build visually, pick a historical window, and get an equity curve, a trade count, a win rate and a drawdown figure without leaving the page. For developing a rough sense of what a strategy would have done, it is fine.
Measured against dedicated tooling, though, it is not close. Open-source frameworks and purpose-built research environments give you things Cryptohopper does not: rigorous fee and slippage modelling, realistic fill assumptions rather than the optimistic assumption that you got the price you asked for, deeper and cleaner historical data, and — the big one — proper walk-forward and out-of-sample testing. That last omission matters more than any missing indicator, because out-of-sample testing is the primary defence against fooling yourself.
Which brings up the deeper issue, and it is not really Cryptohopper's fault. A visual strategy builder attached to an instant backtester is an overfitting machine. The workflow practically invites it: add an indicator, run the test, curve is ugly, tweak the threshold, run it again, repeat until the line goes up and to the right. What you have produced at the end of that loop is not a strategy. It is a description of the past, tuned to noise that will not recur. The easier and faster a backtester is to iterate on, the more efficiently it lets you deceive yourself, and Cryptohopper's is very easy and very fast.
So here is how I would actually use it: use the backtester to reject strategies, not to select them. If an idea cannot survive a historical window at all, kill it. That is a cheap, valid, useful filter. But never promote an idea to real money because the backtest looked good. Promote it to paper trading, and let it earn its way from there.
Paper trading is, in my view, the strongest testing feature Cryptohopper has, and it is badly underused. It runs your rules against live market data in real time with fake money. It is forward-testing, so it cannot be tuned in hindsight. It captures the current regime rather than a historical slice you selected. And it exposes the operational realities — how the bot actually behaves at your evaluation interval, what happens when a position sits open for days, how often your conditions genuinely fire — that no backtest will ever show you. It is available on the free tier. Use it for a month before you fund anything. There is no faster way to find out that the strategy you were about to pay for does not work.
If you take one practical step away from this review, make it that one: open a free Cryptohopper account ->, build the strategy you are curious about, and paper trade it for four weeks before any money moves.
Security and Custody: What You're Actually Exposing
Because Cryptohopper does not hold your funds, the risk model here is different from an exchange's, and it is worth understanding precisely rather than vaguely.
You connect via exchange API keys. When you generate those keys, your exchange lets you choose permissions, and this is the single most important security decision in the entire process: enable trading, disable withdrawals. No bot platform on earth needs withdrawal permission to do its job, and any service that asks for it should be closed immediately. With withdrawals off, the keys physically cannot move coins off your exchange. Add IP whitelisting wherever your exchange supports it, so that a leaked key is useless from anywhere but the expected servers.
What remains after all that? Be clear-eyed about it: a third party holds credentials that can place trades in your account. The realistic worst case is not theft by transfer, it is manipulation by trade — an attacker using compromised keys to buy an illiquid asset they already hold, selling into the bids your account creates, and draining value through the market rather than through a withdrawal. This is a documented pattern across the bot-platform sector generally, and no amount of encryption on a vendor's side eliminates it. Trade-only permissions reduce your exposure enormously. They do not reduce it to zero, and reviews that say "it can't withdraw, so it's safe" are stopping the analysis one step early.
The practical hygiene I would apply to any bot platform, this one included:
- Ring-fence the capital. Use a dedicated exchange sub-account holding only what the bot needs to trade. Not your whole balance.
- Keep long-term positions off the traded account entirely. Coins you intend to hold for years belong in cold storage, not sitting behind an API key.
- Two-factor authentication on the exchange and on Cryptohopper, using an authenticator app rather than SMS.
- Rotate keys periodically, and revoke them the moment you stop using the platform. Dormant keys with trade permission are pure downside.
- Audit the connection list occasionally. Old keys accumulate quietly, and every one is standing exposure for a service you no longer use.
To Cryptohopper's credit, its track record here is clean. It has operated for years without a headline compromise of user API keys, which is genuinely more than several competitors can say, and being a Netherlands-based company operating under EU jurisdiction adds a layer of corporate accountability that a lot of offshore tooling lacks. That is a real point in its favour. It is not a guarantee, and it should not change a single line of the hygiene above.
Cryptohopper vs 3Commas vs Pionex: The Structural Choice
The three obvious options in this space are not really the same kind of product, and the choice between them is structural before it is ever about features.
| Cryptohopper | 3Commas | Pionex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business model | Monthly subscription, 4 tiers | Monthly subscription, 3 tiers + enterprise | No subscription — you pay trading fees |
| Free tier | Yes (Pioneer): 1 bot, capped positions, full paper trading | Yes: limited bots, basic terminal | Everything free; roughly 0.05% maker/taker |
| Entry paid price | ~$24.16/mo (Explorer, annual) | ~$37/mo (Pro, annual) | n/a |
| Top standard tier | ~$107.50/mo (Hero, annual) | ~$59/mo (Expert, annual) | n/a |
| Where your funds sit | Your own exchange | Your own exchange | On Pionex — they custody |
| Where trades execute | Your exchange, via API keys | Your exchange, via API keys | Pionex's own exchange only |
| Strategy building | Visual drag-and-drop designer | Parameter forms + TradingView webhooks | Pick from ~16 preset bots |
| Strategy marketplace | Yes: large, third-party, free and paid | Community presets, no formal storefront | None |
| Copy / social trading | Yes | Yes | No |
| Standout strength | Marketplace breadth + visual building | DCA depth and the SmartTrade terminal | Zero fixed cost, near-zero setup |
| Backtesting | Visual, basic fee modelling | DCA-focused, more metric-driven | Minimal |
| Paper trading | Yes, all tiers | Yes | Demo mode |
| Main weakness | Fixed monthly cost; weak backtester | Steeper learning curve; past API key incident | Locked to one exchange; you give up custody |
| Best suited to | Visual builders and marketplace users with $10k+ | DCA-focused traders who want granular control | Beginners and small accounts testing bots cheaply |
The genuinely important row is "where your funds sit," and it gets discussed far less than pricing. Cryptohopper and 3Commas are automation layers over an exchange you already trust: you keep custody, you can use Bybit, OKX or whatever you already have funded, and the bot only ever holds a trade-permission key. Pionex is a different bargain entirely. The bots cost nothing because Pionex is an exchange earning your trading fees, which means your coins have to live on Pionex. That is a real trade-off rather than a free lunch, and how you feel about it should probably settle the whole question before any feature comparison begins.
The other decision-shaping row is the business model, and it leads somewhere counterintuitive for an article about Cryptohopper. If you are running a small account, the honest recommendation is often not Cryptohopper at all — it is Pionex, because a platform with no fixed cost removes the break-even hurdle from the second section of this review entirely. You can start with Pionex free -> and pay nothing but trading fees while you find out whether bot trading suits you at all. And if your interest is specifically deep DCA configuration rather than visual building or a marketplace, 3Commas is the stronger tool ->. I have written a full Cryptohopper vs 3Commas comparison and a standalone 3Commas review if that is the fork you are standing at.
The Cons I'd Want Someone to Tell Me First
A review that only lists strengths is an advertisement. Here is the honest column, in the order I think it matters.
1. The fixed cost is a permanent drag on a variable return. This is the structural criticism and everything else is downstream of it. In a flat quarter you pay in full. In a drawdown you pay in full. If your account is small, the subscription is quietly the largest single determinant of your net result, and that is a bad position to be in regardless of how good the software is.
2. The tier ladder is built on the two things you will most want more of. Position caps and evaluation interval are precisely the constraints that start to bite once a strategy is working, which means the natural trajectory of a satisfied user is upward through the pricing tiers. That is smart product design. It is also worth seeing clearly before you start rather than after.
3. Outages happen, and they happen to open positions. Rare, but not theoretical. Any strategy you run here should be one that tolerates the platform being unavailable for a few hours without turning a manageable loss into an unmanageable one.
4. Marketplace quality varies enormously and the costs stack. For every well-constructed strategy with an honest multi-year record there are several tuned to a bull run that will not repeat. And each paid subscription raises the return you need just to stand still.
5. Backtesting is the weakest major feature. Fee and slippage modelling is basic and there is no proper out-of-sample workflow. If rigorous strategy research is your priority, you will outgrow this quickly and end up doing that research somewhere else anyway.
6. Breadth becomes surface area. DCA, grid, market-making, arbitrage, a marketplace, copy trading, and a visual designer with dozens of indicators is a lot of product. The failure mode is not that you cannot find a feature. It is that assembling a configuration is so easy that you end up running one you do not fully understand.
7. No native DEX or on-chain support. It is a centralised-exchange tool. In 2026, with meaningful volume sitting on decentralised venues and perp DEXes, that is a real gap and not a small one.
8. The advertised price is the annual price. Month-to-month costs more, so the number on the pricing page generally assumes a twelve-month commitment to something you have not yet validated.
Who Should Subscribe, and Who Should Skip It
Subscribe if you are running roughly $10,000 or more. Above that threshold the fee stops dominating your results and the quality of your strategy takes over, which is exactly the position where paying for reliable infrastructure is a sensible trade rather than a tax on being small.
Subscribe if you think visually. The drag-and-drop strategy designer is the platform's most underrated feature and it is genuinely unusual in this category. If you can describe your trading logic as a flowchart but would never sit down and write it in Python, this is close to the only mainstream tool built for you.
Subscribe if you want automation without becoming a systems administrator. Managed hosting has real value, and pretending otherwise is dishonest about what self-hosting costs in time and attention over a year.
Skip it if your account is a few hundred dollars. The break-even arithmetic is brutal at that size. Use the free Pioneer tier to learn, or use a platform with no fixed cost, and revisit the subscription when the numbers have changed.
Skip it if you came looking for a strategy rather than an executor. The marketplace can rent you rules. It cannot rent you judgement, and the people who do worst here are the ones who subscribed to a listing they never paper traded because they wanted the platform to do their thinking for them.
Skip it if you need serious quantitative research tooling. You will find the backtester frustrating within a month, and you will end up paying for a platform whose main feature you have routed around.
My verdict: Cryptohopper is a solid, mature, honestly-built product that has been running longer than most of its competitors and has kept a clean security record while doing it. It is not a money printer and, to its credit, it does not really claim to be. It is infrastructure. It is priced like infrastructure and it is useful in proportion to the capital and the strategy you bring to it. Judged as infrastructure it is worth the money above roughly $10,000, worth the free tier below that, and worth nobody's money at all if you have not yet paper traded whatever you intend to run on it.
Start on the free plan, paper trade for a month, and let your own results — not this review, and certainly not a marketplace listing — make the subscription decision for you. Try Cryptohopper free ->
FAQ
Does Cryptohopper actually make money?
Cryptohopper does not generate returns. It executes rules that you or a marketplace creator supply, so profitability is entirely a property of the strategy, the market conditions and your risk management, not of the platform. Anyone quoting a reliable percentage figure for "Cryptohopper returns" is really quoting one strategy's past performance in one market regime and presenting it as a product feature. The useful framing: the platform's contribution is consistency and uptime, and the honest question to answer first is whether your strategy has a real edge, because automation multiplies whatever it already does.
Can I use Cryptohopper for free?
Yes, and you should start there. The free Pioneer tier gives you one hopper, a limited number of open positions and, most importantly, full paper trading against live market data. That is enough to connect an exchange, build a strategy in the visual designer and forward-test it for weeks without spending anything. The free tier is too constrained to run a real portfolio, but it is not a crippled demo — it is a genuinely usable sandbox, and skipping it means paying to learn things you could have learned for nothing.
Is Cryptohopper safe, and can it withdraw my funds?
Cryptohopper never custodies your coins. They stay on your exchange and Cryptohopper connects through API keys. If you generate those keys with trading enabled and withdrawals disabled, which is what you should always do, the platform is technically incapable of moving funds off your exchange. The residual risk is trade-based rather than withdrawal-based: compromised keys could in principle be used to execute damaging trades. Mitigate it with a dedicated sub-account holding only trading capital, IP whitelisting where your exchange supports it, app-based 2FA, and periodic key rotation.
Do I need to leave my computer running?
No, and this is the main practical reason people pay for it. Cryptohopper runs on its own servers, so your bot keeps operating with your laptop closed, your machine asleep or your home internet down. The trade-off is that their uptime becomes your uptime: outages do occur, and a stalled bot means a rule that does not fire. The sensible hedge is to place your hard risk limits as resting orders on the exchange itself rather than relying only on bot-side logic, so your downside protection survives the platform being unavailable.
How long should I run it before deciding whether to cancel?
Give any strategy at least a month of paper trading before it touches real money, then at least another two to three months live before drawing conclusions, and judge it on drawdown and consistency rather than on a single good week. Crypto regimes shift, and a strategy that looks excellent in a trending month can be flat or negative in a ranging one. Set your cancellation criteria in advance and in writing, because deciding whether to keep paying while you are underwater is exactly the moment your judgement is at its worst. If you are still on monthly billing, that decision stays cheap.
For a wider look at the alternatives before you commit to anything, see our roundup of the best crypto trading bots for 2026.
Affiliate Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links to Cryptohopper, 3Commas and Pionex. If you sign up through one of them, I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. It costs you nothing and it is what keeps this site running. It also does not change what I write — the cons section above exists precisely because a review that only lists strengths is worthless to the person reading it.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice. Crypto trading involves significant risk of loss. Never trade with money you cannot afford to lose. Always do your own research (DYOR).